drcareers: CMA's career centre for physicians
Advertisement

Electronic letters to:

Research:
M. Justin Zaman, MBBS MSc, Cornelia Junghans, PhD, Neha Sekhri, MBBS, Ruoling Chen, MD PhD, Gene S. Feder, MD, Adam D. Timmis, MBBChir MD, and Harry Hemingway, MBBChir
Presentation of stable angina pectoris among women and South Asian people
CMAJ 2008; 179: 659-667 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Re: The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic
M Justin S Zaman   (14 October 2008)
[Read eLetter] The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic
John A. M. Morphet   (14 October 2008)

Re: The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic 14 October 2008
Previous eLetter  Top
M Justin S Zaman

Send letter to journal:
Re: Re: The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic

j.zaman{at}ucl.ac.uk M Justin S Zaman

We appreciate the comments of Dr Morphet, though would like to again reiterate that our study took place in a chest pain clinic investigating chronic stable angina rather than acute coronary syndromes. In these patients, the resting ECG is usually normal, and most of the work Dr Morphet cites comes from patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

It should also be noted that Bangladeshi patients present with non- classic features of acute myocardial infarction and were treated less aggressively in a study in east London, UK. [K Barakat et al, Heart. 2003 Mar ;89 (3):276-9 12591830]The slower triage in the casualty department and delay in essential treatment is thus of importance.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic 14 October 2008
 Next eLetter Top
John A. M. Morphet
McMaster University

Send letter to journal:
Re: The Role of the Electrocardiogram in the Chest-Pain Clinic

gjmorphet{at}sympatico.ca John A. M. Morphet

Just as patients with chest discomfort due to Angina Pectoris are frozen in countenance and habitus, they are often also frozen in verbalization, necessitating history-taking from the spouse and immediate family. The United Kingdom (1) and American (2) investigators have not concerned themselves with baseline Electrocardiography (ECG) but from a Canadian perspective this observer has always relied on same for help diagnostically, prognostically and therapeutically. The entire “ischemic burden” can be addressed in selected patients with linguistic impediments by way of an 18 lead ECG, targeting all cardiac projections, and which also has at least a passive role in the differentiation of cardiac, from non-cardiogenic pain (3). Infra are four ECG scenarios, other than ST-T shifts, which will be of practical utility in all specialized chest-pain clinics. Diagnostically, terminal negative “u” wave deflections (Fig.1), in the absence of Hypertension, connote the presence of myocardial ischemia due to coronary atherosclerotic occlusive or vasospastic disease (4). Further, denoting eligibility for reperfusion therapy, is the recognition of early tall symmetric T-waves, without ST segment elevation (5), evolving transmural Q-wave or fractured QRS (5) injury in the first few days after infarction (Fig. 2). Prognostically, as it is associated with triple-vessel disease, “Tombstoning” (Fig. 3) is attended by a high mortality rate (19.6% in the first 30 days) and a high rate of complications i.e, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia and complete heart block (7). Finally, the employ of an 18 lead ECG (standard 12 plus right heart V456R and true posterior V789) provides a fuller description of the extent of myocardial injury (thrombolytic candidacy) and the identification of the infarct-related-vessel (3). From a practical vantage-point these auxiliary leads are beneficial in signaling the potential for myocardial rupture (8) and, for example, in the case of the posterior leads (Fig. 4) incriminating the left circumflex in the pathogenesis of mitral regurgitation and congestive heart failure (9). One last point: although the ECG is not a direct anatomic imaging technique, in the absence of a trustworthy patient history, it remains the centre of the decision pathway. I am sure Pardee (1920) (10) would more that agree.

John Morphet MD, FRCP©, FACC, FESC
Dept. of Medicine
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

REFERENCES

1. Zaman MJ, Junghans C, Sekhri N, et al. Presentation of stable angina pectoris among women and South Asian people. CMAJ 2008;179:659-667.
2. Diercks DB, Miller CD. Disparities in the care of chest pain. CMAJ 2008;179(7):631-633.
3. Morphet JAM. Update on acute myocardial infarction a must-read. Can J CME 2000;12:2,20-21.
4. Morphet JAM. U-wave alterations: singular noninvasive electrocardiographic diagnostic markers. JACC 2000;36(6):2015.
5. Adler Y, Sclarovsky S, Assali A, et al: Relationship between the initial ECG patterns and the occurrence and time of appearance of Q-waves in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Noninvas Cardiol 1999;3:16-19,31.
6. Das MK, Khan B, Jacob S, et al. Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2006;113:2495-2501.
7. Guo XH, Yap YG, Chen LJ, et al. Correlation of coronary angiography with “tombstoning” ECG in patients after acute myocardial infarction. (Abstract) PACE 1999;22(4)Part II:714.
8. Yoshino H, Yano K, Sasaki K, et al. St segment elevation in leads 1 and AVL in acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction is an independent risk factor for left ventricular rupture. (Abstract) J Am Cardiol 1997;29:431A.
9. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Feinberg M, et al. Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:748-753.
10. Pardee HEB. An electrocardiographic sign of coronary artery obstruction. Arch Intern Med 1920;26:244.

FIGURES


Fig. 1. Negative “U” waves (arrows). Myocardial ischemia. Reprinted with permission from Perspectives in Cardiology, 1998. Morphet JAM.


Fig. 2. Leads V2 – V4 in acute anterior infarction. Reprinted with permission from reference 5.


Fig. 3. (A) “Tombstoning” ECG of an inferior infarction and an anterior infarction (B). Reprinted with permission from reference 7.


Fig. 4. Lead V9 signifying remote true posterior wall injury. Reprinted with permission from Perspectives in Cardiology 1997. Morphet JAM.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared