CMAJ • July 4, 2006; 175 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.060681.
© 2006 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Undergraduate (including medical student issues)
Right arrow Canada Health Act

NEWS

Medical students oppose two-tier, petition CMA

Barbara Sibbald

CMAJ

More than 20% of Canadian medical students have signed a petition asking the CMA to support publicly funded and accessible medical services.

The petition was set up by the Student Medical Reform Group following CMA delegates' vote last August to support allowing private health insurance and private-sector health services. The reform group, which started 3 years ago at the University of Toronto, is affiliated with the Medical Reform Group, a voluntary group of socially minded physicians concerned with the social, economic and political factors influencing health care.

As of late May, the petition (www.medicalreform.ca) had garnered 1107 signatures representing every Canadian medical school; there are 8177 medical students across Canada.

"It's pretty significant for a grassroots initiative," says Larissa Liontos, who is in the third year of the MD/PhD program at the University of Toronto.

The reform group hopes the petition will result in the CMA "publically stating they support a universally accessible health care system and that patients' ability to pay won't interfere with their access to care," says Liontos, co-chair of the reform group's Toronto chapter. "Paying out of pocket is counter to accessibility," she added. "We don't want to see our future colleagues going down that road."

The vote has also embodied an inherent conflict of interest since physicians stand to gain from the move, she pointed out.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Undergraduate (including medical student issues)
Right arrow Canada Health Act