CMAJ • May 25, 2004; 170 (11). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1040602.
© 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Needs assessment


NEWS
NOUVELLES

SYNOPSIS

Public Health

FP fights for earthquake-proof schools in BC

Deb Jones

Whistler, BC

Every day, Tracy Monk tackles the usual health issues of a family practice. When she takes off her stethoscope, though, her life-saving mission is even more daunting: Monk is determined to protect thousands of children from crumbling schools in BC's next earthquake.


Figure. Historic precedent: Dr. Tracy Monk is lobbying for seismic upgrading of BC schools. Photo by: Don MacKinnon

Older schools built of masonry are disproportionately less stable than other buildings. And since BC is in an earthquake zone, even a moderate tremor is a risk for up to 500 schools housing 30 000 children. A major quake would kill at least 290 people and injure 1000 in schools.

Monk's 9-year-old daughter began attending a masonry school last year, shortly after earthquakes struck Italy and Turkey. There, school buildings had collapsed while other buildings stood. Monk wondered why. She looked up a 1989 Vancouver school board report that predicted local schools — including her daughter's — would collapse at 100 times the rate of a wood frame house. "I wanted to throw up," she recalls.

Monk's 150-member group, Families for School Seismic Safety (FSSS), is backed by provincial public health authorities and engineers. Seismic upgrading — basically reinforcing walls — is dirt cheap when cost is calculated per year of life saved, she says. For about $500 million, seismic upgrades "would protect generations of inhabitants."

The group has had some success. Victoria and Ottawa agreed to fund a seismic risk assessment, and the recent BC budget committed some money, but not for another 2 years. Monk wants federal–provincial cooperation and funding to prevent a disaster.

Elsewhere, Long Beach, California, has already upgraded its schools, while Washington State will be finished upgrading in 4 years. At its current pace, BC schools won't become seismically safe for another 60 years. — Deborah Jones, Whistler, BC





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Needs assessment