This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostic tests
Right arrow Guidelines
Right arrow Neuromuscular disease
Right arrow Occupational Health
CMAJ • May 1, 2001; 164 (9)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Letters
Correspondance

Clinical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome

Timothy J. Best

Hand and plastic surgeon Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.

The clinical update on the utility of the clinical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome1 is a review of a review. The original article highlights the pitfalls of using MEDLINE-based reviews to generate clinical practice guidelines.2 The basic assumption of Kathryn Myers' clinical update is that electrodiagnostic studies represent the gold standard for diagnosis, an assumption the authors of the original article themselves admit is flawed.

Myers extracts the recommendation that "decreased pain sensation in the median nerve distribution is the most helpful finding in making the diagnosis." This finding will only help to diagnose advanced carpal tunnel syndrome, in which the patient's sensation at rest is impaired. Use of this finding will indeed increase the specificity of the examiner's results but will seriously decrease the sensitivity of the clinical examination. If practitioners follow this guideline they will grossly underdiagnose carpal tunnel syndrome and will exclude many patients who would benefit from treatment.

Recent studies point to the carpal compression test as the most reliable and valid physical examination test for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.3,4,5 The goal in recommending a clinical examination technique for the diagnosis of a disorder is both high specificity and sensitivity, and the carpal compression test is a markedly better way to achieve this goal than assessment of median nerve pain threshold.

References

  1. Myers KA. Utility of the clinical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome. CMAJ 2000;163(5):605.[Free Full Text]
  2. D'Arcy CA, McGee S. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000;283:3110-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Marx RG, Bombardier C, Wright JG. What do we know about the reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity? J Hand Surg 1999;24A:185-93.
  4. Marx RG, Hedak PL, Bombardier C, Graham B, Goldsmith C, Wright JG. The reliability of physical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1998;23B:499-502.
  5. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Surgery of the peripheral nerve. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.




This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostic tests
Right arrow Guidelines
Right arrow Neuromuscular disease
Right arrow Occupational Health