CMAJ • July 18, 2006; 175 (2). First published June 27, 2006; doi:10.1503/cmaj.051565
© 2006 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other infectious diseases
Right arrow Dermatology
Right arrowRelated Article

Outbreak in Alberta of community-acquired (USA300) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people with a history of drug use, homelessness or incarceration

Mark Gilbert, Judy MacDonald, Dan Gregson, Jennifer Siushansian, Kunyan Zhang, Sameer Elsayed, Kevin Laupland, Tom Louie, Karen Hope, Michael Mulvey, John Gillespie, Diane Nielsen, Virginia Wheeler, Marie Louie, Agnes Honish, Gloria Keays and John Conly

From the Canadian Field Epidemiology Program (Gilbert, Siushansian), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; the Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance (Zhang, Laupland, Conly), Calgary Laboratory Services (Gregson, Zhang, Elsayed, Laupland, Conly), Calgary Health Region (MacDonald, Gregson, Zhang, Elsayed, Laupland, T. Louie, M. Louie, Hope, Gillespie, Nielsen, Wheeler, Conly) and the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Gregson, Zhang, Elsayed, Laupland, T. Louie, M. Louie, Conly), Medicine (Gregson, Zhang, Laupland, T. Louie, M. Louie, Conly), Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (Zhang, Elsayed, T. Louie, M. Louie, Conly) and Community Health Sciences (MacDonald, Laupland), University of Calgary, Calgary; Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (M. Louie), Alberta Health and Wellness (Honish, Keays), Edmonton, Alta.; and the National Microbiological Laboratory (Mulvey), Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Man.


Figure 114
View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1: Typing results for outbreak-related clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Calgary Health Region (CHR). Left panel: Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing results. Lanes 1–6, representative outbreak-associated clinical isolates; lane M, molecular size markers, 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen). Control strains used: types I (NCTC10442), II (N315), III (85/ 2082), IVa (CA05), IVb (8/6–3P), IVc (MR108), IVd (JCSC 4469) and V (WIS [WBG8318]-JCSC3624), corresponding to distinct amplicon sizes of 613, 398, 280, 776, 493, 200, 881 and 325 bp, respectively. In addition, a 147-bp mecA gene (methicillin-resistant determinant) amplicon was present in all strains. Note: bp = base pairs. Right panel: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of USA 300 strains of MRSA circulating in the CHR between Jan. 1 and Sept. 30, 2004. Lane 1, pattern A (31 of 40 cases, 78%); lane 2, USA300 reference strain pattern; lane 3, pattern B (7 cases, 18%); lane 4, pattern C (2 cases, 5%).

 

Figure 214
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2: Number of cases that furnished the USA300 strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Calgary Health Region by month of specimen collection, from Jan. 1, 2004 through Sept. 30, 2004 (n = 40; 7 historical isolates were included for comparison). A further 310 infections were identified through ongoing surveillance up to Dec. 31, 2005 (8–34 cases per month).

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 1.

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 2.