CMAJ • April 24, 2007; 176 (9). doi:10.1503/cmaj.060962.
© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowcock, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowcock, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ophthalmology
Right arrow Wait Times


Research

The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review

William Hodge, Tanya Horsley, David Albiani, Julia Baryla, Michel Belliveau, Ralf Buhrmann, Michael O'Connor, Jason Blair and Elizabeth Lowcock

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Hodge, Albiani, Buhrmann, O'Connor, Blair, Lowcock), University of Ottawa Eye Institute; the Chalmers Research Group (Hodge, Horsley), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; and the Faculty of Medicine (Baryla, Belliveau), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr. William Hodge, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, 501 Smyth Rd., Ottawa ON K1H 8L6; whodge{at}ottawahospital.on.ca

Background: Cataract surgery is the most common operative procedure performed in Canada, and how patients are affected by wait times for this surgery has important clinical, public health and health policy considerations. We conducted a systematic review to understand the relation between wait time for cataract surgery and patient outcomes and the variables that modify this relation.

Methods: We performed an electronic search of 11 databases and the proceedings of 4 conferences. The search was restricted to studies published after the transition to phacoemulsification (1990). We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Jadad Scale for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohort and case–control studies. The data were found to be inappropriate for meta-analysis, thus we performed a qualitative synthesis.

Results: We found a total of 27 studies that met our inclusion criteria. When these studies were reviewed, a dichotomy was observed for the wait time–outcome relation: outcomes associated with wait times of ≤ 6 weeks were better than outcomes associated with wait times of ≥ 6 months. Patients who waited more than 6 months to receive cataract surgery experienced more vision loss, a reduced quality of life and had an increased rate of falls compared with patients who had wait times of less than 6 weeks. The outcomes associated with wait times between 6 weeks and 6 months remain unclear.

Interpretation: Patients who wait more than 6 months for cataract surgery may experience negative outcomes during the wait period, including vision loss, a reduced quality of life and an increased rate of falls.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
S. Garcia Gutierrez, A. Bilbao, J. M. Beguiristain, G. Navarro, J. Martinez Tapias, J. A. Blasco, J. M. Quintana, and the IRYSS Cataract Group
Variability in the prioritization of patients for cataract extraction
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 3, 2010; (2010): mzq002v1 - mzq002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. W.-k. Chan, A. H. Fan, F. Y.-y. Wong, P. T.-h. Lam, E.-k. Yeoh, C. H.-k. Yam, S. Griffiths, D. S.-c. Lam, and N. Congdon
Waiting Time for Cataract Surgery and Its Influence on Patient Attitudes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2009; 50(8): 3636 - 3642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
A. Zhou, N. Weizblit, and J. Noble
Answer: Answer to Ophthaproblem
Can Fam Physician, December 1, 2008; 54(12): 1700 - 1700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
S Subzwari, E Desapriya, G Scime, S Babul, K Jivani, and I Pike
Effectiveness of cataract surgery in reducing driving-related difficulties: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Inj. Prev., October 1, 2008; 14(5): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
E Desapriya, G Scime, I Pike, P Joshi, and S Subzwari
Cost effectiveness of cataract surgery
Br J Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 92(5): 722 - 722.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
R. Lehman
Evidently...
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2007; 12(4): 103 - 103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2007; 12(4): 127 - 128.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Delay in Care-Cataract Surgery
Ediriweera Desapriya
CMAJ, 25 Apr 2007 [Full text]